I dropped case marking altogether, with one marginal exception. Semantically inanimate nouns are marked when they are the subject of a transitive verb. The verb subject prefix for an inanimate noun is also different. So, in both case marking and verb conjugation, inanimates follow an ergative alignment (mostly), while animates are nominative-accusative:
he-nop |
3IN-fall.over |
it fell over |
kí-tá-nop-im |
3IN.TRANS-1SG-fall.over-CAUS |
it knocked me over |
The language is far enough along that I can complain about the recent weather and environmental conditions:
Ááni | tá-wime | he-tsaaiki-koh | to'pe-yo-se'á |
lately | 1SG-eye | 3IN-itch-INST.APPL | spruce-LNK-wind |
lately my eyes have been itching from allergies |
Noun-noun compounds have a link syllable joining elements (an idea probably most recently inspired by Coast Tsimshian). Incorporated nouns are abbreviated in various ways, most regularly, but a few have particular incorporation stems. So, I could have rephrased things a bit:
Ááni | tei-wim-tsaaiki-koh | to'pe-yo-se'á |
lately | 1SG-eye-itch-INST.APPL | spruce-LNK-wind |
lately my eyes have been itching from allergies |
Notice that the incorporated noun, wime, has been reduced to just wim-. You will also see that Kahtsaai has an instrumental applicative to bring in a new argument. There is also a benefactive applicative, as well as a fossilized locative applicative that is not freely productive.
So far I have omitted evidential marking, which is usually marked:
tówaar | mós | heweitaraa'ánméín |
tówaar | mós | he-wei-taraai-án-mé-n |
meanwhile | tomorrow | 3IN-very-state-hot-FUT-EVID |
it's supposed to be very hot tomorrow |
Here we have a hear-say evidential, somewhat merged with the future marker (Kahtsaai is usually aspect obsessed, not marking tense except for the future). The discourse particle tówaar marks a discourse break, especially a change in topic.